| Total | Meaning | Recommended next step | Evidence to produce |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–10 | The purchasing case is not yet defined | Hold an owner/finance/incumbent scoping meeting | Decision brief and records-repair plan |
| 11–20 | A need may exist but material gaps remain | Complete a coverage and cost review before committing broadly | Baseline, full cost schedule and open-issues list |
| 21–26 | Ready to compare structured proposals, subject to gates | Run consistent interviews and targeted specialist review | Comparable scopes and responsibility map |
| 27–30 | Procurement inputs are well prepared | Complete contract and technical checks before execution | Approved scope, evidence plan and review calendar |
A high score does not mean buy a retainer. A well-prepared owner may correctly decide that the incumbent is sufficient or that a small project is better.
Question 1 of 15
Can you name the decision the advice must improve?
Evidence to show: A defined decision with alternatives
Read the full questions →Editorial preparation framework, not a validated benchmark, tax approval or savings prediction. A high score does not mean buy a retainer. Answers stay in this browser.
Sources cited on this page
This page presents the desk’s editorial framework. Read the section sources →