| Route | Fits when | Output to require | Main weakness to test | Renewal test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expanded incumbent service | Existing capability is sound; planning scope is unclear | Written annual scope and event triggers | Informal promises replacing deliverables | Did the new service occur? |
| Independent diagnostic | Opportunity and scope are uncertain | Baseline, issues and prioritised next work | A sales report that requires a second contract to become useful | Usually project completion, not automatic renewal |
| Scoped specialist project | A sale, partner change or defined technical issue dominates | Opinion/model/implementation package for that event | Dependencies left outside the project | Is a new event or monitoring obligation present? |
| Recurring tax advisory | Several material decisions recur and interact | Scheduled updates and accepted implementation ownership | Year-one work used to justify indefinite fees | Specific continuing work and fresh decisions |
| Finance/CFO support | Weak records and cash visibility block decisions | Reliable reporting and decision models | Operational support sold as tax specialism | Better reporting and decisions, not a tax guarantee |
| Defer additional purchase | No material gap, no usable records or no ability to implement | Evidence-repair or monitoring plan | Delay becoming avoidance of an actual deadline | Revisit on a named trigger |
A diagnostic should be useful even if the buyer does not buy the next service. Require enough explanation for the incumbent to understand findings and a clear statement of what has not been tested.
Explore the structured evidence
Expanded incumbent service
Fits when
Existing capability is sound; planning scope is unclear
Output to require
Written annual scope and event triggers
Main weakness to test
Informal promises replacing deliverables
Renewal test
Read the full comparison →Did the new service occur?
Sources cited on this page
This page presents the desk’s editorial framework. Read the section sources →