| Claimed value | Appropriate comparison | Evidence required | Do not do this |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent tax reduction | With/without strategy after baseline | Tax model and eligibility rationale | Count existing deductions as new |
| Deferral | Payment timing and later liabilities | Multi-year cash schedule | Count the deferred tax as permanent savings |
| Retirement funding | Tax effect plus assets and restricted liquidity | Partner/employee cost and funding model | Treat contributions as free money |
| Asset purchase | Operating value, finance and after-tax cash | Business need, cost and timing | Buy an unnecessary asset for its deduction |
| Risk or admin improvement | Specific service outcome | Fewer unresolved issues, clearer ownership | Invent a dollar saving without evidence |
Original illustration: Provider A costs $40,000 plus $15,000 of implementation and claims $80,000 of permanent benefits; the incumbent identifies $30,000 already in the baseline. The remaining $50,000 is below the $55,000 cost hurdle. Provider B’s $12,000 project with $5,000 external costs and $25,000 of supported incremental benefit would show $8,000 of simple net benefit. These are hypothetical arithmetic cases, not actual supplier offers, and omit fee tax effects and other interactions.
Explore the structured evidence
Permanent tax reduction
Appropriate comparison
With/without strategy after baseline
Evidence required
Tax model and eligibility rationale
Do not do this
Read the full comparison →Count existing deductions as new
Sources cited on this page
This page presents the desk’s editorial framework. Read the section sources →