For the business. For the owner. Before the commitment.Our independence, explained

Market data and deal flow

Preserve the supplied scenario without presenting it as evidence

Planning Basis research deskSection 11 · Page 4 of 12Last updated 3 November 2026

The context pack assumes 25,000–75,000 potential buyers and annual fees of $35,000–$45,000. Multiplying the endpoints yields $875 million–$3.375 billion of hypothetical annual expenditure. The multiplication is correct; the buyer counts, adoption and willingness to pay remain unvalidated.

Scenario Assumed eligible buyers Assumed annual fee Assumed participation Calculated spend
Lower supplied endpoint 25,000 $35,000 100% $875 million
Upper supplied endpoint 75,000 $45,000 100% $3.375 billion
Illustrative sensitivity 25,000 $35,000 20% $175 million
Illustrative sensitivity 75,000 $45,000 20% $675 million

The 20% cases are new sensitivity examples, not observed penetration. They show that adoption assumptions dominate the model. They do not make the initial pool more reliable.

The supplied segment allocations—40% medical, 35% contracting and 25% agency—and growth assumptions of 5–8%, 5–9% and 6–10% respectively remain hypotheses. No independent evidence retrieved validates those allocations or forecasts. Do not publish them as market shares or projected growth.

Explore the structured evidence

Lower supplied endpoint

Assumed eligible buyers

25,000

Assumed annual fee

$35,000

Assumed participation

100%

Calculated spend

$875 million

Read the full comparison →

Sources cited on this page

This page presents the desk’s editorial framework. Read the section sources →